|
ASLA
President Len Hopper, FASLA, discussed the use of genetically modified
plants with Today Programme co-host James McNaughty on November
29, 2000.
They're
going to grow colored grass … intro
SINGLE COMMENT FROM
Scotts spokesman, Cary Beerman (?) "Our energies have been directed into
several areas. One is to look at how we can produce a grass that requires
less pesticide. Another is grasses that require less water. Another is
grass that requires less mowing. The benefit of a slower-growing grass
is pretty obvious actually in that you would mow it less. That benefit
ultimately could mean less exhaust from mowers which reduces less pollution
from that end. It's also a benefit to the consumer who doesn't have to
get out on the lawn. Not everyone enjoys mowing their lawn once a week.
That was a statement
on behalf of the company that's producing "Mow Me Less." Introduction
of Len Hopper - He's worried that all this new grass hasn't been properly
tested.
"We're talking about
something that's going to make some people some money, that may make it
more economical to take care of a golf course, to water it less. This
is not something to be taken lightly. It's not the kind of thing we can't
take a little more time to address properly."
It's a question
of taste, isn't it?
Well, some people
claim that if you want different colored grass or different colored roses,
that there's an aesthetic value to that. My personal feeling is that if
you want a different colored grass or patterned grass then you don't really
want grass.
You're a landscape
architect yourself. Can you imagine, say, purple grass in Central Park
because someone thought it was fun?
I tell you: I had
this vision, driving home this afternoon. I was picturing a situation
where someone might some genetically altered grass seed in their lawn
to get a nice plaid effect. And then they find out they're tied to that
after a period of time and when they go to spray some Round-Up on it to
start over again, they find out not only is it genetically modified for
a plaid effect, it's also pesticide [sic. herbacide] resistant. And for
a sort of Twilight Zone-eternity, they're left to look at their plaid
lawn.
I think it's the
kind of thing we have to be very careful with, pesticide-resistant varieties,
they're being made resistant to the very pesticides that they were supposed
to be susceptible to.
The trouble is
that a fad, is a fad. If you put the stuff on the market people will want
it, wouldn't you say?
There's an attraction
to a low-maintenance landscapes. If someone who could mow a lawn once
a month instead of once a week is a very seductive public advertisement
to make. Unfortunately, once it may be in your yard, there's no telling
where it might spread. There's no controlling where it will go and how
it will mix with other native plants species.
So save our grass?
Yes.
####
|