Dumbarton
Oaks is accepting applications for 2002-2003 fellowships for landscape
architecture, Byzantine and Pre-Columbian studies. Fellowship
opportunities include junior fellowships for students who at the
time of application have fulfilled all preliminary requirements
for a Ph.D. (or appropriate final degree) and will be working
on a dissertation or final project at Dumbarton Oaks under the
direction of a faculty member at their own university. In exceptional
cases, applications may be accepted from students before they
have fulfilled their preliminary requirements for graduation.
Full fellowships are available for scholars who hold a doctorate
(or appropriate final degree) or have established themselves in
their field and wish to pursue their own research. Summer fellowships
are available for scholars in the three areas of study at any
level of advancement. Practicing landscape architects who wish
to apply may be considered for regular (i.e., not junior) fellowships
if they have a master's as their final degree, depending upon
their professional experience, publications in the field and the
stage of their career. Those who are unable to accept fellowships
for at least one full semester should apply for Summer fellowships.
For
additional information and application procedures, visit http://www.doaks.org/fellowships.html
or write:
Office of the Director
Dumbarton Oaks
1703 32nd Street, NW
Washington, DC 20007
Fax: 202-339-6419
Additional
notes for applicants for Fellowships in Landscape Architecture
(from www.doaks.org):
Applicants are urged to read the printed brochure carefully, especially
as regards the application procedures. The following notes may
also be useful:
Studies in Landscape Architecture, as its name implies, treats
all aspects of the field: agrarian, architectural, art, historical,
botanical, cultural, economic, environmental, geographical, horticultural,
social and technological. The Garden Library Rare Book Room is
especially rich in American and European materials that concern
architecture, botany, horticulture and all aspects of garden design;
our holdings comprise mainly books, but also drawings, manuscripts
and prints. The Reference Collection has a wider scope, collecting
material on garden and landscape architecture throughout the world,
together with some works in social history, anthropology, geography,
iconography, etc., as these directly impinge upon landscape architecture
researches carried on here. It is normal for topics to be geared
to the availability of materials in the Dumbarton Oaks collections,
but fellows are encouraged to use the resources of other specialist
libraries and collections in Washington.
Fellowships
have been awarded in the past to scholars from all over the world
and from a wide range of disciplines. Their topics have covered
a wide range that can be assessed from the enclosed list of fellowship
topics from the last 6 years. All research proposals are examined
and ranked according to their own merit. However, we want to encourage
proposals that engage one of the three following domains of research:
(1) dialectic of figurative and
discursive language for gardens and other designed landscapes;
(2) reception and experience of
gardens and other designed landscapes;
(3) changes in production and maintenance
of gardens and other designed landscapes.
Following
in the wake of garden history many different disciplines of contemporary
studies have been pursued at Dumbarton Oaks, either during Symposia
and roundtables, or by scholars during their fellowships. It has
become very obvious that many branches of the humanities (art
history, art criticism, literary studies, history of ideas, philosophy...)
and of the social sciences (social history, cultural geography,
cultural studies, American studies, social anthropology...) were
contributing to the development of studies of garden and designed
landscapes into an interdisciplinary program.
Such
a program may contribute significantly to studies of arts in contemporary
as well as past societies because gardens and designed landscapes
offer a specific relation to their users: they engage them bodily
as well as intellectually. One does not look at a garden or a
designed landscape as one looks at a picture or listen to it as
one listens to music. In both of these cases modern audiences
seek a disengagement of body experience when enjoying works of
art. The same is true with the theater, with literature or with
any kind of reading. Most of the arts invite a disembodied aesthetic
appreciation. Gardens and designed landscapes, to the contrary,
stimulate bodily experiences in order to lead into aesthetic appreciation:
they demand motion, choice of orientation, selection of objects
for attention (very often their experience is described as overwhelming,
beyond words, or beyond the ability to capture with words, a flickering
world of changing experiences). This sets very specific challenges
for our domain of studies in the context of present discussions
in the humanities and the social sciences.
(1)
Dialectic of figurative and discursive language for gardens and
other designed landscapes
The domination of linguistics as a model for the human sciences
ignores the role of figures in communication, intellectual endeavors
and especially in the development of cultural or shared habits,
beliefs, judgments, etc. This is the more to be regretted when
observing the growth of communication and persuasion through visual
imagery in contemporary mass-culture. Studies of experiences of
gardens and designed landscapes offer a broad range of opportunities
for appraising mutual relations between discursive and figurative
language. Discursive language relies upon discrete signs that
command meanings, and meanings are attached to them within some
systemic order. Figurative language relies upon images and forms
amenable to continuous transformation, grafting and concatenation
that are not bound to a specific meaning, and yet always demand
interpretation from observers. Within any particular culture they
introduce particular patterns of imagination that are explored
and extended by the arts. However, developments of discursive
and figurative language are mutually embedded. Studies of gardens
and designed landscapes should allow an understanding of the dialectics
of figurative and discursive language in a domain that engages
body and intellectual experience. It should throw light upon their
course of development according to cultural or social context,
in particular under conditions of conflict or broad change such
as westernization of non-western cultures.
(2)
Reception and experience of gardens and other designed landscapes
Because gardens allow their users to engage ideas as if they were
expressions of "Mother Nature," these relationships can be manipulated
and intentionally used to naturalize ideas, to transform new ideologies
into apparently eternal truth. Designed landscapes and gardens
have been instrumental in the development and exercise of power
in societies since late Antiquity. They have also been developed
in order to naturalize pedagogical, political and commercial purposes.
Garden art and landscape architecture are domains of highly contested
meanings in societies. In particular in political democracies,
in mass societies, in pluri-cultural societies, gardens are places
where nature is summoned as a material for communication. All
of this points to the value of studies of responses to gardens
and designed landscapes, of expectations raised by new design
trends and new discourse about landscape, and of social reception
of these developments in society at large, in the media, in social
praxis. Actually one may look at gardens and designed landscapes
not only as objects of consumption, but much more as places of
social agency.
(3)
Changes in production and maintenance of gardens and other designed
landscapes
An even more contemporary note should be added. Gardening has
been a domain of human labor and action that has not only maintained
a continuity of tools, gestures and working habits despite a tendency
to alter constantly the stock of plants that were used, but also
a continuity of beliefs and attitudes of a metaphysical nature.
This has given way with the rise of new techniques since the early
19th century, and with the spread of mass society in the second
half of the 20th century. Changes in landscape design have moved
at different paces according to thesocial sphere of action to
which they belonged (religion, transportation, agriculture, military
or civil institutions...), following changes in economy and technology.
Thus the whole domain of garden creation and landscape design
and maintenance allows studies of deep practical cultural changes
and the rise of new rituals of care and use of nature in contemporary
urban societies as well as in past societies.