Trade-off at Carmel River
Even an ecologically sensitive development can sometimes damage
existing wetlands. Can a man-made replacement wetland make up for
what was lost?
By Lisa Owens Viani
When Congress passed the Clean Water Act in 1972, one of its intentions
was to stop the rampant building over and filling in of wetlands
taking place throughout the country. In 1989, President George Bush
Sr. stated that a goal of his administration was “no net loss,”
a priority that was implemented into agreements among the agencies
responsible for regulating wetlands. One way—at least theoretically—of
ensuring no net loss is something called wetland “mitigation,”
meaning that new, “replacement” wetlands are created
under the permit a developer receives to fill an existing wetland
to make room for a building, a golf course, or a parking lot.
Image Courtesy Wetlands Research Associates, Inc.
But according to a recent report by the National Research Council,
wetlands are still being destroyed without appropriate—or
any—mitigation. When mitigation does take place, it isn’t
always performed according to the conditions of the permits, says
Paul Jones, wetland expert with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s Region 9 in San Francisco. And though mitigation
wetlands are supposed to be monitored carefully for several years
after they are built, regulatory agencies frequently don’t
follow up the way they should, due to staffing shortages, budget
cuts, and extraordinary workloads. “We devote 90 percent of
our attention to permit issues,” says Jones, referring to
regulatory agencies in general. But once the permit is issued, the
wetland is often not looked at, he says, and developers are left
to their own devices.
When mitigation does happen, how successful is it? Can a wetland
really be re-created? Replacement wetlands are supposed to replicate
the functions and habitat values of the wetlands that were lost,
says Jones, but California wetlands are especially tricky because
of the state’s diverse wetland types and topography. Often,
he says, created wetlands replace neither the functional values
nor the acreage of the original wetlands that were destroyed. These
are crucial because, overall, the state is estimated to have lost
91 percent of its pre-European-settlement wetlands. Seasonal wetlands
in particular have suffered.
…To read the entire article, subscribe to LAM!
| Annual Meeting