Preservation versus Progress in Richmond?
If only it were that simple.
By George Hazelrigg
In May 2003, the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts (VMFA) provided a
public overview of a $100 million expansion plan by Rick Mather,
a talented American architect based in London. Mather, who was at
the presentation, and VMFA director Michael Brand said the plan
showed how the design “will transform the VMFA for the twenty-first
century and add a major work of contemporary architecture to Virginia’s
rich architectural heritage.”
The cascading water
of Halprin's fountain has been turned off, a prelude to its
The presentation was lively, the plans for transformation exciting.
During the ensuing question-and-answer session, however, three anonymous
attendees separately asked essentially the same question: “But
what about the Halprin sculpture garden?”
Good question, since the plan also signals the impending removal
of the sunken sculpture garden designed by Lawrence Halprin, FASLA.
That proposed removal has provoked in turn a controversy first described
by Landscape Architecture in 2001 (see Riprap, July 2001) and featured
by the Washington, D.C.-based Cultural Landscape Foundation (CLF)
in its 2002 list of endangered modern design landscapes.
The death warrant for Halprin’s project has been signed,
but the execution has not yet been carried out. While we are waiting
to condemn or cheer the act, the controversy warrants a closer look.
…To read the entire article, subscribe to LAM!
| Annual Meeting