As part of ASLA’s Livable Communities Advocacy Campaign,
ASLA National and its Members urged congressional offices to support the
Conservation and Reinvestment Act of 2000 (CARA). While the House passed HR
701 by an overwhelming majority, as did the Senate Energy and Natural Resources
Committee, ultimately the legislation was held up from a full floor vote in the Senate by appropriations process.
In an effort to gain bipartisan support, CARA sponsor Senator
Mary Landrieu (D-La.) and Senate leadership reached an agreement on attaching funding for similar coastal and wildlife conservation
programs to other appropriations bills. In early October, the Senate voted to approve
the conference report to the FY2001 Interior Appropriations bill.
Appropriators included in the conference
report a trust fund that provides more money than last year for conservation accounts
but retains control over its distribution. Under the Land Conservation, Preservation and Infrastructure
Improvement Trust,
federal and state sides of the Land and Water Conservation Fund system could receive up to $540 million, state conservation
programs could garner $300 million, urban parks and forestry and historic preservation
funds could get $160 million, and maintenance backlogs at federal sites could receive
up to $150 million. Payments in lieu of taxes could garner $50 million annually.
President Clinton signed the spending
bill.
Kathleen Kennedy is ASLA’s Government Relations Manager.
|
The
Land Conservation, Preservation and Infrastructure Improvement
Trust.
- Under an Interior trust fund called the
Land Conservation, Preservation and Infrastructure Improvement
Trust, Congress authorized $2.4 billion over six years for
conservation programs. $1.6 billion is provided in the first
year, increasing by $160 million each year, to total $2.4
billion in the sixth year. However, spending is subject
to Interior and Commerce-Justice-State
subcommittees' appropriations each year.
- While the trust fund increases conservation
funding and expands opportunities for purchase of endangered
land, it provides far less than the $45 billion over fifteen
years that CARA guaranteed for conservation. Unlike
CARA, the Interior package does not assure the money will
be spent or provide earmarks for specific projects.
- Although the conference report doubles
FY00 conservation funding, CARA would have established permanent
funding. The conference report allocates $18.8 billion
for Interior and related agencies for FY01--$2.5 billion
above the administration's request and $3.9 billion more
than the FY00 level. Most of the increase can be attributed
to nearly $3 billion in wildfire prevention and rehabilitation
funding, including $1.6 billion in emergency money.
|
|